Page 1 of 2

Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 17:04
by ~[FGS]SaSQuATcH~
c h r i s:

*if i make a brush hollow
*does it mean that things can get past it?

DJ:
*I AM THE MAPPER OR U


Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 17:49
by ~][FGS][Nobody~
ROfl....

epic fail


anyway.. hollow just means it's not solid!

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 18:50
by synthetic
Erm, where would you go past the hollow brush? Into SOLID brush?

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 18:55
by ~][FGS][Nobody~
I'm not sure what you mean.. but perhaps that describes it..

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 19:01
by synthetic
So you have the hollow brush, if you can go past it, where would you go? Into solid brush? You cannot go into the solid brush, thus going past the hollow brush makes little sense. If you surround the hollow brush with another set of hollow brushes, then would it not count since going past the hollow brush was the question in the first place, thus youd still need to go past the hollow brushes, and eventually end up nose against the solid brush. :alc:

And I know what brushes are, Ive mapped before.

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 19:06
by ~][FGS][Nobody~
I'm still a bit confused.. but I expected that hollow brush to be used as add-brush within an already existing subtract brush... :?
Creating a hollow brush as subtract brush or even add brush in a non subtracted area doesn't make sense.

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 19:16
by synthetic
Forgot about substract brush, which does create hollow space, but yeah works then. :-)

I found my patience to be a little limited for mapping, but I do recall sitting 12 hours a row on a friggin chair looking at the editor. I suppose Tack's is still up? What about UC?

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 20:46
by ~DJ~
u fail bigfut

U NEVA SHUD THE FULL LOG

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 21:25
by Mastakilla
Why must you complicate things :(

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 21:41
by ~DJ~
tru dat, if none of you understood that "he's the mapper and I am not" wuts so fail about it?


dumb nubz.

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 22:04
by ~[FGS]SaSQuATcH~
That's a conclusion only you would make.

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 22:11
by Mastakilla
It was simple he just messed up a sentense

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 23:43
by ~DJ~
~[FGS]SaSQuATcH~ wrote:That's a conclusion only you would make.

That's a conclusion smart people make.

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 00:03
by ~[FGS]SaSQuATcH~
That's what you think smart people would think. :)

Re: Mapping convo

Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 00:06
by ~][FGS][Nobody~
Smart ones can play stupid ones but as far as I know, this doesn't work the other way around. :o