[FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

The time is right for a suicide!
User avatar
[FGS]Kalman
Throne/6G
Throne/6G
Posts: 931
Joined: 20 Aug 2010, 15:52
Location: 9th circle of hell
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by [FGS]Kalman »

Maybe 145,23,88 (bright,hue,sat)?
And I've got some other values too:
  • 167,21,21
  • 222,32,87
  • 144,21,0 (pure orange)
  • 144,29,149
  • 181,35,84
All of them are in Unreal Light Units
I hope it can help you
Image
deadmau5 is Canada's apology for Justin Bieber!!
Image
User avatar
chin.democ.
chinny!
chinny!
Posts: 2823
Joined: 10 Aug 2006, 17:19
Location: London

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by chin.democ. »

Made a note of those, cheers.
User avatar
[FGS]Kalman
Throne/6G
Throne/6G
Posts: 931
Joined: 20 Aug 2010, 15:52
Location: 9th circle of hell
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by [FGS]Kalman »

I've found a good tool, you can use to convert RGB color to Unreal colors
http://unreal.gamedesign.net/Ulight/
Image
deadmau5 is Canada's apology for Justin Bieber!!
Image
User avatar
Majster
Virtue/4E
Virtue/4E
Posts: 463
Joined: 30 Sep 2010, 20:20
Location: Poland

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by Majster »

I was playing on two HR maps. This maps are good, but I more like weapons, M4, Famas or shotgun. 8-)
I want server with only this stuff, and without augs. :-D
ShadowRunner wrote: There's paranoia and anger everywhere about fps, people are taking 0a FAR too seriously, liven the game up and make it more fun for EVERYONE. (and me and Chees lol)
Alessi
Power/3D
Power/3D
Posts: 293
Joined: 25 Nov 2011, 23:46
Location: I'm in Malta BITCH

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by Alessi »

Didn't even notice Otherworld was owned by you guys! Silly me hehe :bwahaha:
Image
User avatar
ShadowRunner
It's over 5000!
It's over 5000!
Posts: 6882
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:07
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by ShadowRunner »

I run Otherworld, I left FGS, due to a request from FGS, I removed the title.

@ Majster

Thanks for map comments.

About augs - SG maps are generally too big without augs. Certain features don't function well or at all without augs. FGS is a 0-aug server, therefore it is unlikely I will remove augs. When my server was busy, there were aliased players asking/spamming for players to leave and go to altfire, when clearly people were enjoying the new maps. Frankly it was sad. I know some players like Anihex are quite honest about it and don't visit my server, that's their choice, but in general Anihex is in the minority, ZXC, Mirk, AG and most other custom servers are augged.

I am considering removing augs per kill though. So players may only have 4 augs max. This will encourage people to work in co-op more and on SG, that is a lot of fun.
Alessi
Power/3D
Power/3D
Posts: 293
Joined: 25 Nov 2011, 23:46
Location: I'm in Malta BITCH

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by Alessi »

ShadowRunner wrote:I run Otherworld, I left FGS, due to a request from FGS, I removed the title.
Oh..I see
Image
User avatar
ShadowRunner
It's over 5000!
It's over 5000!
Posts: 6882
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:07
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by ShadowRunner »

Current maps

Area51Bunker_V3_152
A51TheDayAfter_V2TacticalB
DXSG_CMD_V1
DXSG_AbydosB
DXSG_Orbital_TNAG_X
Area51_TheDayBefore - offline. I realized it has no guides for the teleporters yet.

expected
DXSG_Silo
DXSG_Skyline
DXSG_Nexus
User avatar
Majster
Virtue/4E
Virtue/4E
Posts: 463
Joined: 30 Sep 2010, 20:20
Location: Poland

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by Majster »

ShadowRunner wrote:I am considering removing augs per kill though. So players may only have 4 augs max. This will encourage people to work in co-op more and on SG, that is a lot of fun.
Yes, it's good idea. :wink:
ShadowRunner wrote:Current maps

Area51Bunker_V3_152
A51TheDayAfter_V2TacticalB
DXSG_CMD_V1
DXSG_AbydosB
DXSG_Orbital_TNAG_X
Area51_TheDayBefore - offline. I realized it has no guides for the teleporters yet.

expected
DXSG_Silo
DXSG_Skyline
DXSG_Nexus
Why only this maps? Can you add DXMPHR and maybe WWII maps? :-D Also, you can add mapvote, because someone may want have choice.
ShadowRunner wrote: There's paranoia and anger everywhere about fps, people are taking 0a FAR too seriously, liven the game up and make it more fun for EVERYONE. (and me and Chees lol)
User avatar
~][FGS][Nobody~
Illuminated
Illuminated
Posts: 5348
Joined: 26 Oct 2005, 16:59
Location: Schland!

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by ~][FGS][Nobody~ »

The others are not SG maps. He wants to host SG maps along with altfire.
Nobody is perfect...
-----------------------
ô¿ô¥[GODZ]¥NOCHANC wrote:I can ban any one I want ANY time I want. You have no rights here.
Magus wrote:Maybe one day I will understand your arcane rituals of voting :)
chin.democ. wrote:You can use light bulbs that emit light, and when shot, do not.
synthetic wrote:and while every person is interesting in their own unique ways, there is some degree of uniqueness that a doctor can help with.
~ô¿ô~][FGS][Nobody~ said: THERE IS NO SPOON!
~¤¥ÐJ¥¤~ said: THERE IS NO CAKE!
Poor
Power/3D
Power/3D
Posts: 288
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 22:39

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by Poor »

The SG maps are large but most people only go to the secret bases :? . The one with the alien base is good though because most people don't know about it and its secret weapons.
User avatar
ShadowRunner
It's over 5000!
It's over 5000!
Posts: 6882
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:07
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by ShadowRunner »

Along with these requests, I have requests for tactical SG and Clyzm/HR also. Nobody, that is incorrect, not just tnag.

I could host a multitude of weps on the same server, but prolly would have to increase gametime, there is nothing worse than downloading shedloads, joining a game then suddenly having to download shedloads again.

The issue with HR maps and Clyzm, is the lag from the wep models. With WW2 I have some unresolved fps issues from textures.
Give it some time and I will figure something out. Thanks for feedback and requests.
User avatar
[FGS]Kalman
Throne/6G
Throne/6G
Posts: 931
Joined: 20 Aug 2010, 15:52
Location: 9th circle of hell
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by [FGS]Kalman »

ShadowRunner wrote:Along with these requests, I have requests for tactical SG and Clyzm/HR also. Nobody, that is incorrect, not just tnag.

I could host a multitude of weps on the same server, but prolly would have to increase gametime, there is nothing worse than downloading shedloads, joining a game then suddenly having to download shedloads again.

The issue with HR maps and Clyzm, is the lag from the wep models. With WW2 I have some unresolved fps issues from textures.
Give it some time and I will figure something out. Thanks for feedback and requests.
I think not the weps models are the problem
I noticed if the texture scale is under 0.25, it will lag
Image
deadmau5 is Canada's apology for Justin Bieber!!
Image
User avatar
Majster
Virtue/4E
Virtue/4E
Posts: 463
Joined: 30 Sep 2010, 20:20
Location: Poland

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by Majster »

ShadowRunner wrote:Give it some time and I will figure something out.
Ok. 8-)
ShadowRunner wrote: There's paranoia and anger everywhere about fps, people are taking 0a FAR too seriously, liven the game up and make it more fun for EVERYONE. (and me and Chees lol)
User avatar
ShadowRunner
It's over 5000!
It's over 5000!
Posts: 6882
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:07
Contact:

Re: [FGS] Otherworld Server - Discussion

Post by ShadowRunner »

Kalman wrote:I think not the weps models are the problem
Sewers map has average polys of 6, there is no brush (except pipes) bigger than six sided anywhere at all in the map
I did hours and hours of testing each Clyzm wep, also some other players made their own tests, definitely SOME of the Clyzm weps are too HIGH poly, especially the DualMP5Kfix.
Kalman wrote:I noticed if the texture scale is under 0.25, it will lag
Cozmo gets problems in-game even with textures scaled to 0.5 size. Other players don't. So it's OS/Hardware?/gfx related also.

I think also it is how you make the texture, because some textures are represented at 1.0 scale, but still cause problems. I think it could be that I was dumb and didn't use 72 dpi but used 300 dpi, or something like this. I need to look at the original pcx files. I was tending to make textures from 512 x 512 pixel sized images. I know Tack recommends less? 256?
In any case, we now have 3500 new textures lol, should keep us busy for a while.

Interestingly, custom textures now look crap, but default textures look very sexy, Maybe I should post some screenie comparisons alongside screenies of my gfx controller settings.

I've just doubled my fps roughly, by fiddling with the texture options in my gfx card settings. I noticed that the names of the parameters were same/similar to the parameters you can fiddle with/tweak in your deusex.ini. ( if you have intel/onboard thingy)
Post Reply